IGBlackInkBackground-2.png
 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
InternetGovBackdrop-1.jpg

It's about time

We Revolutionize Politics

The Internet Government represents a change in self-governance. While majorities may rule in many democratic systems, the Internet Government is an alternative platform for representation based on abstract meritocracy - which represents perspectives, not people; by removing politics from the programming, these human rights and resource issues are deliberated based on merit, not majority. 

 
 

 

 

 
Screen Shot 2018-01-31 at 11.24.24 PM.png

With technology, we can finally upgrade the way we participate in government

 

Imagine:

 

The most informed and inclusive nation-wide debates possible

research-driven policy development without the politics

Totally inclusive and transparent representation

 
christian-deknock-222733.jpg

The online E-Lightenment model

Abstract Meritocracy

By performing content analysis using a decentralized, anonymized, inter-coded, public-participatory framework, volunteers can help process qualitative data which informs arguments on all sides of debates on persistent human rights and resource issues. By decentralizing points in any perspective, they can be reconstructed into more comprehensive argument frameworks, which are then programmed to respond to each other; enabling the most comprehensive and complex debate on any important issue possible.



Perspectives, not people

 The Internet Government is a system of representation of perspectives, not people. Your voice in place of a vote. Imagine if all socio-political perspectives, and all the research, reason, and rhetoric which supports them could directly debate each other. Instead of electing politicians to represent socio-political perspectives and carry out deliberations, people may directly upload their own perspectives to the system. The system manages how people operate within this bicameral inter-coding system to overcomes the tyranny of the majority, corruption, collusion, and bias; welcoming a new age of reason.


Merit, Not Majority 

Traditionally, decisions are made in a democracy by consensus of a majority, however in this system, decisions are made by meeting a more sophisticated mathematical threshold when legislation responds to arguments of merit on every side of an issue. Merit is assessed by assigning established classifications of logic, knowledge, evidence, etc., identified by anonymized, collaborative, content analysis coders working within a judicial-style hierarchical system. Merit is not to identify "debate winners" but to assist in curating legitimate arguments and identifying incorrigible conflicts in values to which legislation will have to respond.


programmed w/o politics

We rely on politicians to articulate our views in government, but there are limits to how well representatives (and humans in general) can participate in meaningful, honest, unbiased, and thorough debate; instead, we can build radically inclusive argument frameworks, thereby creating the most complex and comprehensive public discourse on persisting human rights and resource issues possible. This open and inclusive process is not meant to identify winning platforms, but to produce superior legislative outcomes which respond to the needs of all perspectives expressed.


 
Screen Shot 2018-01-31 at 11.19.18 PM.png
Checkbox *
 
 
patrik-gothe-444.jpg

 

OUR BIG SISTER

 The Society Library

is watching, and we're watching back.

The Society Library is our 501(c)3 non-profit, educational parent organization. It is the closed, inter-coding, twin system which is to be compared to the conclusions of the public Internet Government system in order to discover inherent bias or possible collusion of the private and public groups despite the systems' structural defenses and redundancies. The Society Library publishes the collaborative content for educational purposes in a visually-navigable, contextual library which reimagines the presentation of information via search engines (the Internet Government manages input, the Society Library inter-codes, then delivers output). The Internet Government and Society Library manage ideological conflicts regarding the definition, distribution, and defense of persisting and pressing human rights and resource conflicts for educational and awareness purposes. 

 

 
Screen Shot 2017-09-25 at 1.30.16 AM.png
 

vendors_07.png

effectively abolish political parties

Ideas represented in this system are not identified by party affiliation unless an argument specifically relies on addressing one. Within this system, political parties are effectively abolished; respective ideas are represented as is.


enable more Effective socio-political Discourse

Conflicting perspectives may be more easily distilled to their core logical or value-driven conflicts, therefore a greater focus may be applied to developing innovative solutions which respond to those conflicts. 

vendors_04.png

Change peoples' relationship with government

In such a system, people can represent themselves directly by uploading their ideas into the system. People can replace federal legislative politicians as public servants by volunteering to help process data. This is closer to true self-governance.


Centralizes educational resources to identify research opportunities

In taking stock of knowledge contributing to argument frameworks, the system can serve to direct where further research or peer-review is needed on pertinent topics.

vendors_06.png

end corruption, create transparent Decision Making 

Every decision "made" in the system (by meeting mathematical thresholds) is transparently displayed for public scrutiny. This is the equivalent to being able to witness every thought and conversation of a representative in government.


TEMPER EXTREME POLITICAL SOCIALIZATION 

Generationally inherited knowledge could become increasingly less asymmetrically influenced by sociological variables and/or thought-bubble online behaviors if a centralized source is created and widely accessible.

vendors_02.png

makes the most informed decisions possible

There are limits to how much information humans (one on one or in groups) can intellectually process, ideate, and communicate. In a collaborative, inter-coded digital system, we can greatly expand those limits and make more informed decisions.


IMPROVE OVERALL SOCIAL ORGANIZATION

This system could enable humanity to better examine, understand, and communicate with itself for the purpose of more sincere self-governance, with the intention of enabling better decisions (made more quickly) by recognizing patterns of thought.

 

 
christian-fregnan-291609.jpg

Want to be an Honorary Founder of the Internet Government?

BE AMONG THE FIRST 10,000 TO DONATE $100.00 TO THE CAUSE VIA OUR PARENT 501(C)3 NON-PROFIT (THE {Benjamin Franklin} SOCIETY LIBRARY) TO BE ARCHIVED AS ONE OF THE HONORARY FOUNDING Funding FIGURES OF THE INTERNET GOVERNMENT.


NAMES LISTED IN ORDER RECEIVED. RESTRICTIONS APPLY.

Donate Here
 

 

We Accept Cryptocurrency Donations:


 
timon-studler-63413.jpg

With or without you, this is for & about you.

 

So learn more & then join us. 

Donate To Our Non-profit treasury

Take the Time To Drop A Line

Name *
Name